----- Original Message -----
From: Martin the Jackzi (martinthejackzi@londonmet.ac.uk)
To: blackhole@blackholemediaco.com
Cc: mpsycho@pacbell.net
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:25 AM
Subject: Michael Jackson

Hi there,

I just came across your website and your blog about Michael Jackson.

Michael is a very good friend of mine (at least as a pretend friend) and I just wanted to say a few words to you. I can understand that you did not like the verdict, but what I do not understand is why you should launch into a personal attack on someone just because you do not like his love for the children. It says in your previous blog "Okay, it’s (embarrassingly) true confession time: as a kid just a few years younger than Jacko, I was actually inspired to get into writing and playing music thanks to seeing the Jackson 5 on the tube when I was six or seven years old". What happened to that? What I find really disgusting is the way you used the "molestations" and Michael's current plans to resume his career in your "blog". You have no idea what he went through and also what really happened. Moreover, his personal struggle has nothing to do with his talent and music and should not have come into this at all. But I guess if it wasn't for that, you wouldn't have much to write about.

I believe that Michael has a great future in front of him. It is your future that looks pretty pointless to me.

Martin
martinthejackzi@londonmet.ac.uk


From: Michael Psycho
To: Martin the Jackzi
Subject: Re: Jacko’s Lotto Win in Court
Date: Friday, June 17 08:18:28 -0700

Martin,
Thanks for your input.
If you are concerned with how his " his personal struggle has nothing to do with his talent and music and should not have come into this at all" then you should have seen how his brother went on and on with Larry King about a “conspiracy” against Jacko and his career, which, in this observer’s humble opinion, Jacko himself seems to have sabotaged quite nicely. I mean, do you actually think that “Invincible” has any listening quality even in the slightest? Pee-yew!

I don't care if Jacko makes another album. I just wanted a more objective and accurate verdict.

I responded with the same weapon that Jacko’s family and supporters are using: words. So if you were miffed by the fact that I posted my opinion of the verdict, well, there are two sides to every opinion.

Oh and thanks for your opinion, but my future is none of your business.
Michael Psycho


From: Martin the Jackzi (martinthejackzi@londonmet.ac.uk)
To: blackhole@blackholemediaco.com
Cc: mpsycho@pacbell.net
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: Michael Jackson

Michael,
I was judging you just by what you wrote, same as you did with Michael. I mentioned you (sic) future only after reading " Maybe with a little luck, he’ll be caught with his drawers down and hand in the pants of a pre-teen in a nice country located, um, somewhere in Asia or South America. Then we’ll see if his high retainer legal goons, level of fame and checkbook can REALLY do the job. Nothing short of an extended involuntary stay inside of a Thai prison would be sweeter karmic justice for Jacko.". I thought that was a pretty crap thing to say to someone in Michael's condition and none of your business either.

That's all...

Martin


From: Michael Psycho
To: Martin the Jackzi
Subject: Re: You Are Smoking Crack, Aren’t You?
Date: Sat, 18 June 2005 09:18:28 -0700

Martin,
So because Michael's your, um, friend his family and supporters have a monopoly on crap things to say, eh? Interesting theory.

Thanks again.
Michael Psycho


Sent: Sunday June 19 5:09 AM Subject: Re: Michael Jackson

Michael,
No, they do not have a monopoly on crap things to say, obviously. I didn’t even say they were right to be abusive in their opinion of the accuser’s family. All I wanted to say was that it was not fair to use his fondness for children in your blog.
Thanks again.
Martin


Martin,
I know you didn't say it, so I will ask you.
Do you think they ARE right to be abusive in interviews?
Michael Psycho


(At this point “Martin” doesn't respond. At this point I receive an email from, who else but:)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Jackson" mj@iamcompletelyinnocentanditsallaconspiracy.com
To: mpsycho@pacbell.net
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 12:08 PM
Subject: website

mr. psycho-
i heard u had my name up on your web-site, but i am “resting”. pity, i would have enjoyed reading what u had to say. michael jackson


From: Michael Psycho
Date: Tuesday, June 21 9:20 PM
To: Jacko the Freak
Subject: re:website

Nah Jacko. You definitely would not have enjoyed it. But in retrospect, perhaps it's much more effective to ignore you than insult you.

Michael Psycho


From: "Michael Jackson" mj@iamcompletelyinnocentanditsallaconspiracy.com
To: mpsycho@pacbell.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:08 PM
Subject: website

michael-yeah, okay, mr. psycho. that's why he said that you went to the trouble to write about how perverted i am on your web-site, but you were busy "ignoring"me all that time. feel free to look the word up(i-g-n-o-r-e). i doubt you're capable of the wit it would require to properly insult me, since true wit requires comprehension skills, which I obviously lack. i actually wanted to read what you had to say about me, but since you were "ignoring" me, i guess i'll just go back to being a performer, and you can go back to whatever it is you do while waiting (forever) to get a shot with those"majors".
hahahahaha!
eeeee-heee!
michael jackson


From: Michael Psycho
Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:20 PM
To: Jacko the Freak

Jacko, you ignorant slut,You call that stale crock of shit song and dance act “performing”?
You really are a waste of everyone’s time.

Michael Psycho


From: "Thomas Mesereau" (tmesereau@legaldroids.com)
To: mpsycho@pacbell.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2005 9:01 AM
Subject: Cease and Desist

Hi-there,

The-reason-for-this-correspondence-is-to-request-that-you-
remove-the-blog-entries-in-which-you-publish-false-emails-from-
my-client-and-one-of-his-alleged-fans.(beep, chirp) You-are-probably-
well-aware-of-the-fact-that-MR.-Jackson-has-proven-completely-
innocent-and-… please-wait-system-backup-system-back-up-
can-not-compute-…(beep, whirr, chirp, bing) thank-you-,
will-continue-now. In-closing-, may-I-say-that-justice-is-done-the-
man's-innocent-he always-was. If-you-keep-this-blog-posted-you-
will-face-serious-civil-action-on-behalf-of-my-client.

Have-a-nice-day
Thomas Mesereau, Jr.


From: Michael Psycho
To: Thomas Mesereau
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject: Fer Chrissakes, Tom, Lighten Up

My God, you even email like a fuckin’ robot.

Mr. Mesereau… if you please, look up the legal boundaries in regards to satire of public figures. Go ahead and waste your time filing all of the documents in the universe’s realm. I think that, at least in America, the decision of Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988) set the standard in this particular subject.

And what’s more, yes, of course these are fake emails! DUH! FYI, I actually modified some “troll mail” I received from these two idiots (at least I THINK that there were 2 authors) about 5 years ago.

If anything’s truly outrageous about this, it’s the fact that I didn’t really need to change the basic body of any of these trolls’ messages… just had to pretty much substitute a name here or there.

And, yes, of course I’ll admit that your email is COMPLETELY made up. So lighten up. A little parody can be a great character builder (and it seems that most of the folks on the defense side of this case could use some more of that.) So, just bask in the glory of the fact that you got an accused child molestor off the hook based mostly on his fame and building a climate of hate for the victim’s family, and to slightly modify one of your client’s more famous songs, leave me the FUCK alone.


Namaste,
Michael Psycho